Granny's Tales and Treasures
School Memories - Croydon High School
Names have been redacted and some small sections have been omitted for privacy reasons
​
Croydon High School was administered by the Girls Public Day School Trust, which had several schools, predominantly within striking distance of London. When I attended, they were what was known as direct grant schools, which meant that three quarters of the pupils were fee-paying and the remainder were there at the expense of the local council, on the strength of their good eleven-plus performance. When I first joined, the fees were £37 a term for senior school pupils. As a ‘free-place’ pupil I always felt stigmatised but talking to fellow pupils in later years, others did not feel the same.​

1968
I distinctly remember our ‘taster’ day, the term before starting. Three people went from my primary school, myself, * and *. I can visualise being in the hall which had a stage and raised seating areas on both sides. I thought that I would like to make friends with a particular girl, probably because I envied her pony tail but we were never in the same class. There was a four form entry and * and I were in S1.22 (S denoted a senior school class) with English teacher Miss * as our form mistress. She was one of the younger teachers. Many of our class already knew each other from having been in the junior school together. From that first day, I remember * and *. They both sat near the front and they later became my particular friends. * and I sat near the back, with * and * in front of us. Someone had made a mistake with class numbers and two people were asked to volunteer to move to S1.21 instead. * and * got there before * and I. Had I been moved, my friendships might have been very different as, until year four, we were taught in class groups for everything except Maths and French, for which we were set by ability; we were later also set for music. Class sizes were about thirty until we reached sixth form, when they were much smaller, perhaps twelve, or fewer for subjects, such as Religious Knowledge, that were undersubscribed.
​
The school was a new one, having only been on that site, in Selsdon, for a year when I arrived. When I was in the upper school, probably in the sixth form, there was a proposal to build a swimming pool and an aggressive fundraising campaign began. Each year, we held ‘Guild Day’, when the whole school had various stalls to raise money for charity. One year we were told not to bring in all our second-hand items for Guild Day, as we would need them for fund raising for the swimming pool. I and one or two others were vocal in our objection to this. Miss Cameron, the headmistress, said if we weren’t going to help raise money for the swimming pool, that was fine but then we should not use it once it was built. Despite enjoying swimming, I never did.
​
We could usually sit where we liked, although some teachers wanted us to stick to the same seats, presumably to help them remember who we were. In the winter months, I always made a beeline for a seat next to the radiator, as I felt the cold. ​Although the building was modern, Some of the equipment was not and we had desks with lids that came in pairs. Each was equipped with an inkwell, which was regularly refilled by the ink monitor. The inkwells frequently also got filled with blotting paper, making them unpleasant and unusable. We were expected to write with fountain pen and everyone was provided with a scratchy dip pen when we first entered the school, although I don’t think anyone actually used these, unless they’d forgotten their own pen. In the first years at the school, most of our pens needed to be filled using the ink from the inkwells. You squeezed a rubber reservoir inside the pen, which then filled with ink. Cartridge pens soon proved less messy, making the inkwells redundant. In the last few years at school we were allowed to write with biro.
​
Like most school children, the compass in the pencil case proved just too tempting and many desks were embellished with carvings. When one pupil carved f**k on a desk, a word that was very rarely heard in conversation at that time, it was a step too far. After assembly, the first years were asked to leave, leaving my class, then in the second year, sitting in the front row. Miss Cameron was a diminutive lady of Scottish heritage, with an icy stare, a masters degree in bio-chemistry from Cambridge and a manner that could be acerbic. She was, in most ways, an excellent head mistress. Her speech on this occasion began, ‘You may think it is amusing to write f**k on a desk…..’. The impact of hearing any adult, let alone our headmistress, use this word was astounding. The rate of carving on desks probably dropped significantly for some time.
​
I travelled to school on the ‘Shirley coach’ for which mum paid termly, aided by a travel grant from the council. The coach was organised by one of the parents. I had to walk up beyond Shirley Library to a side street and wait for the coach, which occasionally didn’t turn up. The coach was over-subscribed and we often sat three to a seat. Legally, this was only allowed for those under the age of ten and this seemed to be a senior school only venture, so no one was that young. Occasionally, an officious driver refused to let the additional people on and we were left marooned. In retrospect, he was well within his rights. On the bus, I became friendly with and usually sat next to *.
​
We came home on the bus, or rather buses, usually getting the 54 or 64 from Selsdon to Croydon and then the 194 family (194, 194a, 194b or 194c) or 119 home. An alternative was to get a 130 from Croydon and then a long walk from Shirley Oaks but I did this occasionally for variety and to save the fare. Once a year we tried to walk all the way home. Once we were fourteen and therefore liable for adult bus fares, we were issued with bus passes, so that we could continue to pay half fare. You did ask for ‘a half to Shirley’, or wherever, rather than say ‘a child’, as you would now.
​
I can’t remember the official school start time, perhaps 8.50am or 9am but the first lesson began at 9.20am. The school day ended at 3.45 on Mondays, Tuesday and Thursdays, when there were eight, thirty five minute[1] lessons each day. On Wednesdays and Fridays, there were only seven lessons and school finished at 3.10pm. In the fourth form and in the lower sixth[2] we had Friday afternoons off, shortening our timetable by a further two lessons per week.
​
It was unheard of to go home for lunch. We were expected to commit to school dinners for half a term and I tried these in my first half term and I think a couple of times for half terms after that; it did not go well and I almost always took a packed lunch.
​
From S1.22 on the ground floor, we became S2.15, at the top of four-storey high K block, then to S111.17, back on the shady ground floor with maths teacher, Miss *. There followed two years with Miss *, as IV.10 and V.10. We were mixed up and split into much smaller sixth form classes, but our friendships had been established in the first five years. I was in VI.1.31a and then VI.2.31a, with Miss *. Almost everyone stayed on to sixth form.
​​
The school day began with registration in our form rooms. In the first to fifth forms, the register was arranged alphabetically by surname and we were each allocated a number; I was 5. This meant that the teacher did not have to say anything; we just called out our numbers in order. If someone was absent, we said so. For most of the time, there were thirty people in the class and we always finished with ‘thirty one is dead’. Looking back, I am quite surprised that it was never suggested that this was inappropriate. Next was the daily assembly, with prayers, a hymn and I think a short talk, as well as notices. It was a relief to reach the age, fourth form I think, when we no longer sat on the floor, instead we had chairs on the raised portion of the hall, or in the dining room, which could be opened up on to the hall, creating a balcony. At the beginning and/or the end of each term we said the school prayer, which was glued in the back of our Songs of Praise hymn books. I can still remember extracts from this.
My first year timetable shows that we were taught English, maths, science (physics), biology, history, geography, French, RE, PE, swimming, needlework, art, music, and singing. We had English, maths and French every day but for most subjects, we had two lessons a week. The following year, Latin and chemistry were added to the timetable and swimming was dropped.
We were provided with exercise books and each subject was allocated a different coloured cover, purple for RE, yellow for French, red for history and so on. Further up the school, we used loose-leaf paper fastened in to folders with treasury tags. Some subjects, such as geography (pale green cover), had larger books with plain paper, so we could draw in them, or past in maps produced in purple ink on the Banda machine. Some teachers were more adventurous and managed to use more than one colour. We also had a rough book, with inferior quality paper, for notes. The stationery monitor was responsible for issuing new books which were checked and initialled by the teacher, to indicate that you hadn’t wasted pages.
I was put in set B for maths. I think these sets ranged from B to D or E and there were two set Bs. I was taught by Miss * and then, for ‘O’ level, by Miss *. Maths is one of the subjects where I actually did better during the term that I spent at home in the fourth form. Work was sent regularly for me in all subjects and other pupils visited and lent me their books so that I could copy their notes.
I started off in set E for French in the first year. This was the set for those who had not previously done very much French. By the second year, we were amalgamated with the other sets and I drifted between sets C and D, of 4. We had, what was at the time, a state of the art ‘language lab’ but I found spoken French more difficult than the written work. Despite this, I passed my French aural ‘O’ level the first time and failed the written exam. Latin gave me up after two years; languages are just not my thing. I did try and * and I were once told off for writing in our rough books during Latin, when we were in fact taking notes but I somehow didn’t take to Latin at all. * and I didn’t actually need to pass notes as we learned the alphabet in sign language and communicated in class in this way. We got quite proficient and could spell out words rapidly.
I definitely preferred biology to physics or chemistry. We benefitted from new science labs, where we sat on high wooden stools and had gas taps, asbestos mats and Bunsen burners on each large desk. Geography was usually taught on the top floor of K block. For some reason a life-sized model crocodile lived in one of the geography rooms. It may be that it was left over from a Guild Day. I particularly liked mapwork and relied on the mapwork and weather questions to boost my marks in geography exams. I still enjoy following driving routes on Ordnance Survey maps.
We did hockey, netball and gym in the winter and tennis, cricket and rounders in the summer. I quite enjoyed tennis and in the summer term of the first year I went in on a Saturday for coaching from coaches from the Lawn Tennis Association but I was still pretty useless. Cricket, with the heavy ball that made me fear for my glasses and hockey on the freezing redgra pitch at the top of the hill were the worst. I do remember the excitement when the England football team, who were staying at neighbouring Selsdon Park Hotel, practiced on our hockey pitch. This was the era of the likes of Gordon Banks. After each PE lesson was the humiliation of the communal showers. These were a U shape and you had to run round the U and rescue your towel at the end. We made endless excuses to get out of these, with the ‘time of the month’ being the obvious one, to the extent that one teacher questioned our biology. She was particularly sceptical that so many of us used this excuse at once. There is a, largely debunked, theory that the cycles of women who are in close proximity often do align.
I had extra-curricular ballroom dancing lessons in the second year but was disillusioned by always having to be the boy. The fact that I can’t ballroom dance has never been a handicap in my later life.
I always enjoyed art and thought that I was quite passable at it until the humiliation of failing ‘O’ level, twice. Miss * taught us for ‘O’ level and as she managed to write a report for me for the term when I was absent and therefore did no art, I obviously didn’t make much of an impression. Lower down the school, I remember being remonstrated with for painting an entire sheet of paper red, which I wanted for a background; I should obviously just have asked for red sugar paper. Apart from drawing and painting, we also did lino-cut printing and pottery. I also enjoyed needlework, taught by Miss *. Certainly by the third year, we were allowed to choose what to make and she helped us with the patterns we had chosen. I made a green flowery dress and one point. I liked music too and was in set B. We used to listen to classical music and follow along in the scores, which was more fun than it sounds. I do have a recollection of working through music theory books but I don’t think I took an exam.
​
Drama was something else I enjoyed and we had an outdoor ‘drama courtyard’ with a stage and ranked steps for the audience, as well as a drama studio and a hall suitable for performances. Each year, the fourth to sixth form students could form groups to take part in the Drama Festival and I was Miss Prism in the Importance of Being Ernest in 6.1, along with others of my former V.10 classmates. At the end of 6.1, the school play was Schiller’s Mary Stuart. Granted, the two main characters are female but there were a lot of male supporting roles for girls to fill. I was Bellievre, the envoy to the Duke of Anjou.​

Mary Stuart - me on the left
Our ‘O’ level exam subjects choices which we studied from age fourteen (the fourth year, now year ten), were based partly on timetable restrictions but primarily on ensuring that we had the right subjects for university entrance. At the time, the minimum requirements were ‘O’ level passes in maths, English, a science, a foreign language and either history or geography. As eight ‘O’ levels was the standard number, there was then space for three other subjects. As well as the subjects we had learned lower down the school, it was possible to begin German or Greek at this stage. I opted for maths, English, physics, biology, history, geography, French and art. After I missed a term of school, in the fourth year, I gave up physics, as not having seen the experiments was a handicap. I think we had one double and one single lesson a week for most ‘O’ level subjects; there may have been more for maths and English. We also still had to endure PE. One year, our timetable left us with a Thursday afternoon when we had a maths lesson sandwiched between two PE lessons; no wonder I disliked Thursdays. It was several weeks before we could persuade Miss * to let us come to that maths lesson in our PE kit.
I always enjoyed exams, with the exception of languages and latterly physics. I can remember walking up Cheston Avenue in the sun, wearing my favourite yellow and white stripped summer uniform, feeling that I had the required information in my head and somehow that knowledge poured out after an exam, to make room for the next subject. Despite working hard and making and broadly sticking to a complex revision timetable, my results were mediocre. We sat London Board examinations, where the pass grades were A, C, E; other boards used A, B, C and this needed explanation in job applications, as E was largely regarded as a fail, which it wasn’t for us. Apparently, London Board did this so that the grades would align with those awarded at ‘A’ level. I achieved A grades in maths and history, Cs in geography and biology, E in English and Fs in art and French. Grades were based on a curve of natural distribution and I believe the top twenty percent of the cohort were awarded A, the next twenty percent C, then E and forty percent of those who sat a particular subject would fail. I resat French in the autumn, along with others who had failed and a few who were sitting early, by this means, I managed to get a C. I resat art the following year and failed again. In 6.1 we could choose to take and additional ‘O’ level, either British Constitution, Russian, Additional Maths or Geology. I chose British Constitution, as being compatible with history and gained my seventh ‘O’ level at grade E.
When it came to choosing ‘A’ levels, to be studied in the sixth form, I had quite a long short-list. In the end, I decided against biology, as I didn’t want to do animal dissections, geography was ruled out as I didn’t want to go on residential field trips, not fully grasping calculus crossed maths off this list and art was no longer an option as I had failed the ‘O’ level. This left me with history, religious knowledge and English literature. The school had a policy of not offering religious knowledge or English literature at ‘O’ level; the latter because they thought that ‘O’ level study would spoil literature for us. This meant that I ended up with two subjects at ‘A’ level that I had not studied at ‘O’ level.
History had been my favourite subject all through high school, largely down to the inspirational teaching of Mrs *. Although not one of the younger teachers, she was very forward thinking and willing to deviate from the typical traditional chalk and talk, ‘copy these notes from the board’, type of lesson, which predominated. I have enduring memories of using papier mâché to create a large model of a Viking village on a piece of hardboard, complete with match box houses with raffia roofs. I repeated this exercise for my own students when I was teaching. I also drew a blackboard-sized plan of a Tudor ship on paper using a black marker pen. History ‘O’ level, taught by Mrs *, was a little less interesting but the course included the slave trade, the Russian revolution and the suffragette movement. I think the industrial revolution also had a place.
‘A’ level history consisted of two papers, English history, for which we studied the Tudors and world history, where our topic was the age of exploration. In fact, the English paper was officially Tudors and Stuarts but there was plenty of choice of essays and it was thought only necessary to cover half the syllabus. Unfortunately, one of my history ‘A’ level teachers was Miss *. Miss * had probably trained in the 1930s or 1940s and she was still using her yellowed, dog-eared notes from that era. These she read out, or wrote on the board for us to copy and that was it. We then wrote an essay on that particular topic for homework. Even more unfortunately, we had Miss * for world history one year and English history the next. In this way, she successfully ruined both halves of the syllabus. In addition, she spent the last few lessons before the exam discussing not history but Watergate,[3] which was in the news at the time. I got a grade D for history. I still feel that I deserved more than that and had I know that there was an option to have papers remarked, I would have asked for it to be done.
Religious Knowledge was taught by Miss *. One paper covered parts of the Old Testament, mostly the prophets and one the New, the gospels and Acts. To be fair to Miss *, she approached this more like a history course and never expected her students to have Christian beliefs. She was keen, for example, on considering rational explanations for the miracles. Teaching here too was exclusively copying notes and writing essays. I achieved another grade D for Religious Knowledge.
​
English Literature was a little different. Again there were two distinct strands. Shakespeare and Chaucer, taught by Miss * and novels, plays and poetry, taught by Miss *. These two ladies could not have been more different. Imagine a stereotypical 1950s school-marm and you have Miss *, complete with scraped back bun, horn-rimmed spectacles and wrinkly lisle stockings. Miss *, by contrast, was young and lively. With her, we studied Sons and Lovers and Pride and Prejudice for novels and were encouraged to read all the works of those authors. D H Lawrence was of course a revelation. Poetry was the metaphysical poets and Alexander Pope. Our plays were Dr Faustus and Royal Hunt of the Son, which we acted out in the modern drama studio. I was chosen as Attawallpa, which involved standing on a desk proclaiming most of the time. There was also a long standing joke involving an inflatable green rabbit, which lived in the drama studio. The precise nature of this now escapes me.
​
English ‘A’ level also involved poetry appreciation, analysing the impact of different metres, alliteration and other devices, which I really enjoyed. This was a separate paper and also included comprehension. We studied Chaucer’s Prologue from the Canterbury Tales, King Lear and As You Like it. I remember learning pages and pages of quotes for both English papers. In fact, we also learned quotes from notable historians, such as Elton and Bindoff, for history and biblical quotes for religious knowledge. A key memory of learning King Lear was being taken by Miss * to see a production in the Fairfield Halls in Croydon. This featured Ian McKellan, then in his thirties, as the mad Edgar. Imagine Miss *’s reaction and indeed the reactions of some of my more sheltered classmates, when he appeared on stage stark naked.
English was my most successful ‘A’ level and I got a grade B. Like ‘O’ levels, these too were marked on a curve of natural distribution. As only about fifteen percent of the population took ‘A’ levels at this time and then only ten percent achieved a grade A, this accolade was much harder to come by than it is today. Thirty percent of all ‘A’ level candidates failed. All three of my subjects were examined by essay and each examination was three hours long. I did start ‘S’ level English, an extension of ‘A’ level, involving wide reading of classic novels but I didn’t finish the course and take the exam.
​
We had six lessons each week for our ‘A’ level subjects plus a double lesson each for four different ‘liberal studies’, which changed termly. These additional subjects covered topics that were dear to the teacher’s hearts. This enabled me to study a local history course that led to my first proper research project, studying the history of Chaldon Church, which contains what is believed to be the oldest surviving church mural. I also remember a course on the history of language, in which I looked at the origins of place names. One of my liberal studies was riding but not for long. Having fallen off a horse a couple of years previously, I found that being back on horseback made me feel sick. It was to be best part of fifty years before I got on a horse again. My diaries suggest that I also did statistics, philosophy, music appreciation, pottery, social biology, keep fit and art appreciation. I think that my voluntary work in a local babies’ home also counted as a liberal study.
The homework that was expected was quite demanding. Even in the first year, we were set two or three subjects each night, usually these were expected to take half an hour each. When you think that my journey home took an hour, this didn’t leave a great deal of free time. By the sixth form, we could have three hours homework each night.
​
What was probably a life defining moment for me was being chosen to read in the carol service during my first term. Only two pupils[2] from each year was picked and the ‘auditions’ were done in the RE lessons, although we were not aware of this at the time. I had to read Genesis chapter 3 verses 8-15 and it was the first reading. I have never been worried about public speaking since and I went on to have five years of elocution lessons, gaining the dizzy heights of speech and drama grade 3!
I enjoyed helping in the school library. There were two libraries, the Middle School Library, for years one to three and the senior school library, for the older girls. Sixth formers were responsible for particular subject areas, for ensuring the books were in the right places, compiling lists of missing books and chasing up those who had not returned books on time. Together with *, I was given charge of the history section in March 1973 and was the senior school librarian in my final year.​
.jpg)
Me in the Library 1974
In general, I did well in the first year, mostly getting 70% or more in my end of year exams and coming near the top of the class. After this, I disengaged a little as I didn’t find the work challenging and this had a detrimental effect on my results. Overall, I would say that I enjoyed school and I now realise what an excellent education we were given.
Two other school related memories need to be recorded. Firstly the time of the power cuts at the beginning of 1972. Industrial action meant that electricity was cut off to homes and workplaces for three hour intervals, up to three times a day. There was a rota for one these cuts would be so that one day you would have no power from 6-9am, then again from 12-3pm and 6-9pm. The following day, your cuts would be 9am-12 and 3-6pm. Although this obviously effected both home and school, it is the school cuts that I remember most. ​I was at senior school at the height of the troubles in Ireland and we did get the occasional bomb scare, which involved evacuating the whole school and disrupting lessons for several hours.
​
At the beginning of 6.2, those who wanted to go to university filled in UCCA[5] forms, whereby we could apply to five universities. At the time, I was aiming to be an Educational Psychologist, which required a degree and a teaching qualification. My first choice was Lancaster to study, I think, Psychology and Education and I attend for what was more of a look round than an interview. I was offered a place on the condition that I achieved grades CCD. Although my grades were slightly different, I could still have gone. I also applied to, Hull (offer BCC), Sheffield (I am not sure what the outcome here was), Cardiff (rejected) and Reading[6] (rejected). In addition, I applied to Berkshire College of Education, which was offering a new course, combining a degree with a teaching qualification. This was quite innovative, as most teaching qualifications were still certificates, rather than degrees.
[1] According to my first year timetable, which survives, the first two lessons were 40 minutes and 50 minutes, with the remainder being 35.
[2] We didn’t use the terms lower and upper sixth, we called them 6.1 and 6.2.
[3] This was the scandal that led to the impeachment of U.S. President Nixon.
[4] There were approximately 120 pupils in each year.
[5] Universities Central Council on Admissions.
[6] I could have sworn that my final application was to Kent but the paperwork says Reading.